Disclaimer

DISCLAIMER: The foregoing has been prepared solely for informational purposes, and is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any thought or instrument or to participate in any particular thought process. I am not a seminarian, an economist or a politician, but this blog may contain thoughts that may pertain to any of the above, and these are just my thoughts on the date of record. I reserve the right to change my opinion or thoughts based on new information, new misinformation or life experiences. Although not all thoughts may necessarily be original (after all, there is "nothing new under the sun"), I will do my best to point out where I have borrowed other's thoughts and ran with it. WARNING: Continued reading may result in headaches, apparent loss of intelligence or apparent gain in intelligence, or initial annoyance at the writer of this blog. This blog is not intended for the weak at heart, the ill-tempered, or people who already know it all. Read at your own risk, and only post or email comments to me in a friendly manner if you really expect or desire a response. Consult your family therapist before reading this blog. If the views of this blog are overly offensive to you, seek immediate attention. The thoughts provided are not meant to raise your blood pressure - just to get you thinking, but in certain cases, may require an increase in blood pressure in order to get you thinking. Clark's Thoughts may not be suitable for all people.

Friday, August 28, 2020

Are you a procrastinator or a "prioritzor?"


Photo by Magnet.me on Unsplash


Maybe you’ve never had a job interview before. Maybe you’ve had many of them. Some questions will be invariably easier to answer than others.

 

But one question you need to be ready for is this one: “What is your greatest weakness?”

 

I’ve been interviewed many times and I’ve had to interview potential employees many times.

 

When this question is asked, it is painful (and sometimes humorous) to watch some of the potential job candidates squirm in their seats as they struggle to find an answer to their “greatest weakness.”

 

Sometimes, I’ve had potential candidates be bold enough to state that, “I can’t think of any area for improvement,” or even “I have no weaknesses that I can think of.”

 

Guess what?

 

They weren’t hired.

 

Their huge ego or their lack of introspection was obviously an area of weakness. Maybe both.

 

Even if the candidates were all-stars in each and every area of their job function, there has to be at least one area that isn’t as good as the others. Everyone can improve. Everyone should strive for perfection. If you aren’t perfect, then there is still room to grow and improve.

 

If you are perfect, then why are you in a job interview in the first place?

 

If we don’t have the ability to honestly self-evaluate our current abilities, then we won’t know what areas of our life (personal or professional) need improvement.

 

I don’t want to hire an employee that isn’t willing to admit areas of weakness and improve on them, and neither does your potential employer.

 

Admittedly, we don’t want to bring up all of our skeletons during our initial job interview. But we must be prepared to have a satisfactory answer for this question.

 

While many of my friends and colleagues would be quick to identify many of my areas of weakness, years ago I came up with my standard my standard “go-to” answer during a job interview:

 

“I am deadline driven.”

 

I have always been deadline-driven. If you want something done by the 15th of the month, don’t expect me to provide it to you on the 10th. If you want it on the 10th — you need to tell me that up front. I will do whatever it takes to meet the deadline, but don’t expect it any earlier.

 

My wife always tells me that my weakness is because I procrastinate.

 

I will tell you it is because I prioritize.

 

I try to fit as much as I possibly can into both my personal and work lives. When she tells me that she wants me to paint the kitchen, I let her know that I will “get to it.” Of course, I never do.

 

Why?

 

Because she hasn’t given me a deadline.

 

So — am I a procrastinator or a “prioritzor?” The truth is that I am neither a procrastinator nor a “prioritizor.” While some people may be true procrastinators, I am not one of them.

 

There have been many times in my life that I fell victim to the Student Syndrome — a term that refers to “planned” procrastination, but I don’t think I am a victim of this today.

 

I remember back in college I was certainly guilty of falling prey to the Student Syndrome. I would wait until the last possible moment to start a research a paper and then pull an all-nighter to get it completed and turned into my professor. Why did I put it off for so long? I had other, non-important but far more enjoyable things to do, like football games, basketball games, socializing and watching TV.

 

While I may not be guilty of the Student Syndrome now, I am certainly guilty of falling victim to Parkinson’s Law.

 

Parkinson’s Law is generally expressed as the phrase “Work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion.”

 

If I have a deadline to complete something in 4 weeks, it will be done in 4 weeks.

 

If I have the same task but only given two weeks to complete it, it will generally be done in two weeks. Nothing has changed but the deadline.

 

To meet the condensed deadline, I have to prioritize. What can I put off in order to make certain that I can get the other assigned task done within 2-weeks time? If I have excess time, I will try fit in something that is a higher priority and finish the task later. Or I may have to delay other non-pressing tasks (like painting the kitchen) in order to meet the 2-week deadline. Either way, I have to prioritize.

 

You may look at the terms Parkinson’s Law and Student Syndrome as being the same thing.

 

I do not.

 

With Student Syndrome, you intentionally put something off because you just don’t want to do it. With Parkinson’s Law, you continue to do the amount of work that is required so that it is still accomplished within the given time period.

 

Keep in mind that Parkinson’s Law, or the phrase, “Work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion” can be a double-edged sword for employers.

 

Some employers may give highly-motivated and highly-productive team members a shorter time period to compete their tasks knowing full well that the employee will do whatever they have to do in order to meet that deadline.

 

Other employers — one’s that are not familiar with Parkinson’s Law — may give too much time between assigning the task and the deadline for completion. What happens in this case? All too often, work will “expand” so that it takes the entire allotted time. (We will sometimes refer to this a “billing-and-chilling” in my industry.) They employee could finish quicker, but they drag their feet, don’t work as hard as they should, and bill the company unnecessarily while “taking it easy.”

 

It is important for an employer to set reasonable deadlines and expectations so that employees don’t get abused by Parkinson’s Law (being assigned too much work in a short period of time) and so they don’t abuse the company by Parkinson’s Law (dragging their feet so that the employee is unproductive and doesn’t get the work accomplished until the required deadline.)

 

Employers that understand Parkinson’s Law should establish reasonable time expectations for the actual work that needs to be accomplished — not too much and not too little. It needs to be just right to maintain optimum productivity.

 

So, there you have it.

 

I am neither a procrastinator or a “prioritizor.”

 

I guess I am a “Parkinsonian” — guilty of falling victim to Parkinson’s Law.

 

Regardless, I am still deadline-driven, and some employers may view this as an area of weakness.

 

Now, time for some introspection:

 

What is your greatest area of weakness? How will you respond during a job interview?